« IN WINN AMMO RFID External Hard Drive | Home | Samsung Story Station offers simple and attractive storage »
Apple Music Event 2003-itunes Music Store Introduction
By admin | March 14, 2010
Here we see Steve Jobs introducing the itunes Music Store for the first time ever.
Related posts:
- iTunes for Windows This is Steve Jobs introducing and demonstrating iTunes for...
- Transferring iTunes Music (Without and External Hard Drive) This is a new video responding to my last...
- Silent Night iTunes Theme – Black iTunes on Windows Silent Night iTunes Theme – Black iTunes on Windows...
- How to Use iTunes : How to Add Files to iTunes Library Adding files (or songs) to your iTunes library is...
- Coldplay – Apple iTunes Viva La Vida This it the Official Coldplay “Viva La Vida” iTunes...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Topics: storage | 25 Comments »
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
oh shut up
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
shitty quality
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
ovi sucks
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
you think the artists gets the ten bucks you buy a cd for? they get less than 10 percent, itunes pays them more than anyone ever has before.
and what are you blabbing about youtube? who is stealing youtube? idiot
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
wow, back then it was that hard to get a song?
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
@johnmonk66 i buy cds and even vinyl.. point of the matter is that it’s a shitty system that doesn’t allow musicians to grow if i knew that when i buy music on itunes that most of my money would go to support the artist i would use it but that would be a world gone tipsy toppy and btw what are you doing on youtube almost everything on youtube has copyright on it…
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
you are full of shit, you ar stealing music
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
so because artists get ripped off, your answer is to peer to peer music so they get nothing at all, nice logic thief
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Why should you buy anything when you can steal it?
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
iTunes is just a shiny new facade for the ugly, exploitative system that has managed music for the past 50 years. Thanks to peer to peer filesharing, we finally have a chance to break the major record label system– but every iTunes user who pays 90 cents on the dollar to middlemen props up the old regime and delays the day when corporations finally lose their stranglehold on music. Now that’s something to feel guilty about.
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Apple gets 3 times as much money as musicians from each sale. Apple takes a 35% cut from every song and every album sold, a huge amount considering how little they have to do. Record labels receive the other 65% of each sale. Of this, major label artists will end up with only 8 to 14 cents per song, depending on their contract. Many of them will never even see this paltry share because they have to pay for producers and recording costs. Artists Get Ripped Off follks
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Rhapsody is better. Why? Because I know some artist that are extremely hard to find and can’t find them in music store or iTunes but there they are waiting for my music hungry ears in Rhapsody. iPod Touch all the way!
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
I actually like the idea of iTunes music store just because its just 99 cents per song unlike other services… and I do not like the idea of stealing either but I only wish they had music store in India so I could buy my songs…
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
because that is illegal.
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
first off i dont care about bad karma and the artist that i listen cant make new music anyway cos his dead
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
-> bad karma – plus: how can the artist you love to listen to continue to make their great music, when they are not for it?
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
why should i pay for my music when i have utorrent
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Apple limits iPod this way, I believe, to discourage piracy and mass dumping of one person’s entire library to another computer (which, by the way, is illegal anyway), and that policy applies whether you bought your music from them or not. But, the music you buy from iTunes or Amazon is no longer encumbered and can be transferred to an unlimited number of devices – just not transferred back FROM an iPod. But that’s a limitation imposed on the iPod, not a limitation of the content itself.
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Absolutely correct. What people don’t realize is that if they don’t pay for music, musicians don’t make money, so why make music? People think music is like a book, you are allowed to give the book away, but you don’t keep a copy of the book. You can’t print your own copies just because you bought 1 book. Same with music, if you actually give the song away that’s fine, but you can’t give a copy of it away
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
really? you are saying I can play all my ipod music on anything I want? Then why, if you plug someone elses ipod into your computer, will it refuse to copy the music and will only sync the ipod if you agree to erase it?
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
aac is such a pain in the arse
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
fuck paying for songs
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Haha thanks for this info.
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
The law would disagree. Your purchase of music gives you the right to listen to that music, but not give it to anyone else. That is true regardless of the source of the music (CD, download) or the distribution method (copy the CD, send the mp3 to a friend). Whether you agree with the law is a totally different issue, but it doesn’t change the law.
You are welcome to research the law more on your own. Good luck!
March 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Thanks for the information. I dont think sharing with friends music is stealing, after all someone bought it.